|
In 1954, while the "Graves" growths had just published their own classification, the wine syndicate of Saint-Emilion, composed by wine growers, brokers and wine traders with the approval of the
INAO - Institut National des Appellations d'Origine (A.O.C), decided to work on a classification
for the wines of Saint-Emilion. Initially, four grades were defined. These were reduced to two - First Great Classified Growth (A and B) and
Great Classified Growth - in 1984.
As of Medoc's 1855 historical grading, the Saint-Emilion Great
Classified Growth classification is based not only on qualitative criteria by tasting the wines on a ten years period previous to the assessment, but also on commercial considerations such as:
- sales price levels
- national and international commercial distribution
- the estate's reputation on the market
Properties who don't manage to join the club of about sixty Classified Growths are given the denomination of Great Growth ("Grand Cru"), while the remaining wineries of the
A.O.C are simply reported as "Saint-Emilion". It is to be noted that the owners must officially apply to appear in this official classification. Thus for example the famous Chateau Tertre-Roteboeuf, whose quality and reputation would easily justify to be listed among the First Great Classified Growths, does not appear here by the will of its owner, François Mitjaville.
The Saint-Emilion Great Growth classification was revised in 1969, 1985, 1996 and 2006. The only two
guaranteed
vintage (A.O.C) who can apply to the classification are the "Saint-Emilion Grand Cru" and
"Saint-Emilion" areas.
By grading 61 properties, the 2006 revision confirmed many growths from the former classification, but also caused a number of surprises and a few inevitable disappointments. Many observers thought that the impressive progression of Perse's Chateau Pavie
since 1998 would be rewarded by an upgrade into the First Great Classified Growth (A) category, but finally such was not the case.
Among the estates promoted to the First Great Classified Growths (B) category are Chateau Troplong-Mondot and Pavie-Macquin, whose efforts made since the Nineties fully justify their new grade. It should be noted that no First Great Classified
Growth was relegated to the
lower
Great Classified Growth
class.
Promoted growths from the status of Great Growth ("Grand Cru") to
Great Classified Growth
("Grand Cru Classé") are:
Chateaux Bellefont-Belcier, Destieux, Fleur Cardinale, Grand Corbin, Grand Corbin-Despagne and Monbousquet.
The demoted growths from the status of
Great Classified Growth
to Great Growth are:
Chateaux Bellevue, Cadet Bon, Faurie de Souchard, Guadet Saint-Julien, La Tour du Pin-Figeac (Belivier), La Tour du Pin-Figeac (Moueix), Lamarzelle, Petite Faurie de Soutard, Tertre Daugay, Villemaurine and Yon-Figeac. If the recent
samples of some of the above mentioned properties may justify their current downgrade, there are great chances that estates
like Bellevue, Tertre Daugay or Yon-Figeac will be upgraded to their previous rankings by the next revision in 2016 as the progresses noted after 2000
(1993 - 2002),
but not entering in the range of vintages appointed for the criteria of selection for the 2006
classification, are noticable.
The two following estates have completely disappeared from the Saint-Emilion Grand Cru Classification: Curé-Bon-la-Madeleine (integrated meanwhile to Chateau Canon) and La Clusière (integrated meanwhile to Chateau Pavie).
Finally, no estate considered as "garagiste" has integrated the classification. Valendraud, Mondotte, Le Dome, Bellevue-Mondotte or Magrez-Fombrauge
have, for the least, the potential to be ranked as Great Classified Growth
status. In sight of the very fine quality reached by the above mentioned estates
in recent vintages as well as the innovative wine making
methods used by the "garagistes", it remains to be seen whether the authorities will dare to cross the
line in 2016..?
TOP
|